PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

An audit’s feasibility must be assessed using multiple factors, not just resource availability.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3 – Establishing the Audit Program: Requires consideration of logistical, technical, and cooperation factors when assessing audit feasibility.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.3 – Determining Feasibility of the Audit: Requires evaluating more than just resources to ensure a successful audit.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Audit feasibility should consider:

Availability of information (documents, records).

Cooperation from the auditee.

Operational conditions that might affect the audit.

Scope and complexity of the QMS being audited.

Resource availability alone is not enough to determine feasibility.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Top management determines feasibility) → Incorrect because feasibility is determined by the certification body, not the auditee.

C (Resources alone are sufficient) → Incorrect because other key factors must be evaluated.

D (Final authority lies with the audit leader) → Incorrect because ISO requires multiple factors to be considered, not just an auditor’s decision.

Understanding Clause 7.1.5.2 – Measurement Traceability:ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to ensure that measuring equipment (e.g., spectrometers) is calibrated and traceable to recognized standards. The failure to maintain calibration within valid dates directly violates this clause and raises concerns about the reliability of the measurement results.

Root Cause of the Nonconformity:The organization failed to plan for the possibility that the calibration service provider (X-TECH) might become unavailable, leading to expired calibration. This indicates inadequate risk-based thinking, which is required under Clause 6.1 of ISO 9001:2015.

Option Analysis:

A. Select one sample for external lab analysis to use as an internal standard:Incorrect. While using an internal standard could provide short-term verification of results, this action does not address the root cause (failure to consider risks associated with external providers).

B. Look for a local company to provide this service:Incorrect. While finding a new local service provider resolves the immediate calibration issue, it does not address the risk of future provider unavailability.

C. Double-check one out of ten samples externally:Incorrect. This corrective action ensures some quality assurance for batch release but does not resolve the nonconformance related to expired calibration.

D. Add this issue to the external issue register, assess its associated risk, and plan action to address that risk:Correct. This approach directly addresses the root cause (failure to anticipate the calibration provider leaving) and ensures proper risk management. ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking under Clause 6.1, requiring organizations to identify risks and opportunities and implement plans to mitigate them.

Why D is the Best Option:

By adding the issue to the external issue register, the organization ensures it is monitored and tracked.

Assessing the risk ensures proactive measures are in place for similar issues in the future.

Planning actions to address the risk ensures a sustainable solution is implemented, such as identifying multiple service providers or ensuring backup plans for calibration services.

ISO 9001 References:

Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities): Requires organizations to consider risks and opportunities that could affect the intended results of the QMS.

Clause 7.1.5.2 (Measurement Traceability): Mandates that measuring equipment must be calibrated and traceable to ensure valid results.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires organizations to determine the root cause of nonconformities and take actions to ensure they do not recur.

Documented information is a means by which an organization demonstrates compliance. It communicates what we do and how we do things, it communicates what happened and what results were achieved. It is, essentially, a tool for communication. ISO 9001:2015 allows an organization flexibility in the way it chooses to document its quality management system (QMS). This enables each individual organization to determine the correct amount of documented information needed in order to demonstrate the effective planning, operation and control of its processes and the implementation and continual improvement of the effectiveness of its QMS. The standard states that the organization shall maintain documented information to the extent necessary to support the operation of processes and retain documented information to the extent necessary to have confidence that the processes are being carried out as planned. Therefore, the purpose of retaining documented information is to support the operation of the processes of the QMS, not to facilitate auditing, provide confidence or safeguard integrity, which are secondary benefits of documented information. References: Guidance on the requirements for Documented Information of ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001:2015 documented information | CQI | IRCA, Documented Information Required by ISO 9001:2015 - 9000 Store