Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam Questions and Answers

The best option for troubleshooting the issue without having execute access to workloads and nodes is to use Network Connectivity Center to perform a Connectivity Test from Cluster A to Cluster B. Network Connectivity Center is a service that allows you to create, manage, and monitor network connectivity across Google Cloud, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments. You can use Network Connectivity Center to perform a Connectivity Test, which is a feature that allows you to test the reachability and latency between two endpoints, such as GKE clusters, VM instances, or IP addresses. By using Network Connectivity Center to perform a Connectivity Test from Cluster A to Cluster B, you can identify the layer at which the network connectivity is broken, such as the firewall, routing, or load balancing.

https://sre.google/sre-book/service-level-objectives/

You want the application's SLO to more closely reflect it's observed reliability. The key here is error budget never goes over 5%. This means they can have additional downtime and still stay within their budget.

The correct answer is C. Change the machine type for your VMs to n2-standard-8.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, the network throughput performance of a Compute Engine VM depends on its machine type1. The n2-standard-2 machine type has a maximum egress bandwidth of 4 Gbps, which can be a bottleneck for serving large files. By changing the machine type to n2-standard-8, you can increase the maximum egress bandwidth to 16 Gbps, which can improve the network throughput performance and reduce the download time for users.You also need to enable per VM Tier_1 networking performance, which is a feature that allows VMs to achieve higher network performance than the default settings2.

The other options are incorrect because they do not improve the network throughput performance of your VMs.Option A is incorrect because Cloud NAT is a service that allows private IP addresses to access the internet, but it does not increase the network bandwidth or speed3.Option B is incorrect because adding additional network interfaces (NICs) or IP addresses per NIC does not increase ingress or egress bandwidth for a VM1.Option D is incorrect because deploying the Ops Agent can help you monitor and troubleshoot your VMs, but it does not affect the network throughput performance4.

https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/securing-builds/use-encrypted-credentials

https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/pushing-and-pulling

The best option for configuring Cloud Monitoring dashboards to only display metrics from the projects within one folder is to create new scoping projects for each folder. A scoping project is a project that defines which resources are monitored by Cloud Monitoring. You can create new scoping projects for each folder by using the gcloud monitoring register-project command. This way, you can associate each scoping project with a folder and only monitor the resources within that folder. You can then configure Cloud Monitoring dashboards to use the scoping projects as data sources and only display metrics from the projects within one folder.

The most effective ways to measure application reliability from a user perspective without making any engineering changes are to create new synthetic clients to simulate a user journey using the application, and to use current and historic Request Logs to trace customer interaction with the application. These methods can help you monitor the availability, latency, and errors of your application from an end-user perspective .

The best option for creating the development and production environments for each team while minimizing costs and ensuring isolation is to create a development and a production GKE cluster in separate projects, in each cluster create a Kubernetes namespace per team, and then configure Kubernetes role-based access control (RBAC) so that each team can only access its own namespace. This option allows you to use fewer clusters and projects than creating one project or cluster per team, which reduces costs and complexity. It also allows you to isolate each team’s environment by using namespaces and RBAC, which prevents teams from accessing other teams’ environments.

According to SRE Workbook, one of potential SLI is as below:

* Type of service: Request-driven

* Type of SLI: Availability

* Description: The proportion of requests that resulted in a successful response.

https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/

Eliminate bad monitoring : Unactionable alerts (i.e., spam)https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/management-tools/meeting-reliability-challenges-with-sre-principles

agree with kyubiblaze about having to remove unactionable items aka spam: "good monitoring alerts on actionable problems" @https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/management-tools/meeting-reliability-challenges-with-sre-principles

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/audit#access-control

The best option for storing all logs for one year and minimizing required code changes is to create a logs bucket and logging sink, set the retention on the logs bucket to 365 days, configure the logging sink to send logs to the bucket, and give your client access to the bucket to retrieve the logs. A logs bucket is a Cloud Storage bucket that is used to store logs from Cloud Logging. A logging sink is a resource that defines where log entries are sent, such as a logs bucket, BigQuery dataset, or Pub/Sub topic. You can create a logs bucket and logging sink in Cloud Logging and set the retention on the logs bucket to 365 days. This way, you can ensure that all logs are stored for one year and protected from deletion. You can also configure the logging sink to send logs from Cloud Run and Cloud Functions to the logs bucket without any code changes. You can then give your client access to the logs bucket by using IAM policies or signed URLs.

https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/horizontalpodautoscaler

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler changes the shape of your Kubernetes workload by automatically increasing or decreasing the number of Pods in response to the workload's CPU or memory consumption

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General GKE and GitOps Knowledge:

The requirements are:

Enforce constraint templates (implying a policy agent like OPA Gatekeeper) on GKE.

Store policy parameters in a GitHub repository.

Automatically apply changes from the GitHub repository to the clusters.

This is a classic GitOps scenario.

A. Set up a GitHub action to trigger Cloud Build when there is a parameter change. In Cloud Build, run a gcloud CLI command to apply the change.This is a plausible CI/CD approach. GitHub Actions can trigger Cloud Build, which can then use kubectl or gcloud to apply configurations. However, this is a push-based imperative approach. GitOps tools offer a more declarative, pull-based model specifically designed for syncing Kubernetes configurations.  

B. When there is a change in GitHub, use a webhook to send a request to Cloud Service Mesh, and apply the change.Cloud Service Mesh (based on Istio) is primarily for managing traffic, security, and observability for microservices. It's not designed for applying general Kubernetes policy configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from a Git repository.  

C. Configure Config Sync with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Sync to apply the change.Config Sync is a Google Cloud product specifically designed for GitOps with GKE (and other Kubernetes clusters). It synchronizes configurations (including CustomResourceDefinitions for constraint templates and the constraints themselves) from a Git repository (like GitHub) to your clusters. It continuously monitors the repository and automatically applies any committed changes to the clusters, ensuring they remain in the desired state. This perfectly matches the requirements.  

D. Configure Config Connector with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Connector to apply the change.Config Connector allows you to manage Google Cloud resources (like Pub/Sub topics, Spanner instances, etc.) using Kubernetes-style declarative configurations and kubectl. While it uses Kubernetes tooling, its primary purpose is managing Google Cloud resources, not syncing general Kubernetes configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from Git. Config Sync is the tool for syncing arbitrary Kubernetes manifests from Git to a cluster.  

Config Sync is the Google Cloud tool built for the exact purpose described: maintaining consistency between Kubernetes cluster configurations and a Git repository using a GitOps model.

Reference (Based on Google Cloud GKE and Config Sync documentation):

Config Sync Overview: https://cloud.google.com/anthos-config-management/docs/config-sync-overview or https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/add-on/config-sync/overview (if referring to it as a GKE add-on). "Config Sync is a GitOps tool that helps you keep your Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Enterprise edition clusters synchronized with configs stored in a Git repository."  

It supports syncing various Kubernetes objects, including CustomResources, which are used by OPA Gatekeeper for defining constraints and constraint templates.

It automatically pulls changes from the Git repository and applies them, which meets the "automatically applied when changes occur" requirement.

The best option for investigating the issue with your application’s performance in Google Cloud is to configure Cloud Trace in your application. Cloud Trace is a service that allows you to collect and analyze latency data from your application. You can use Cloud Trace to trace requests across different components of your application, such as downstream dependencies, and identify where they take longer to complete. You can also use Cloud Trace to compare latency data across different versions of your application, and detect any performance degradation or improvement. By using Cloud Trace, you can diagnose and troubleshoot performance issues with your application in Google Cloud.

The correct answer is A. Notify the team that their error budget is used up. Negotiate with the team for a launch freeze or tolerate a slightly worse user experience.

According to the Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices, an error budget is the amount of unreliability that a service can tolerate without harming user satisfaction1.An error budget is derived from the service-level objectives (SLOs), which are the measurable goals for the service quality2. When a service exceeds its error budget, it means that it has violated its SLOs and may have negatively impacted the users.In this case, the SRE team should notify the product team that their error budget is used up and negotiate with them for a launch freeze or a lower SLO3. A launch freeze means that no new features are deployed until the service reliability is restored. A lower SLO means that the product team accepts a slightly worse user experience in exchange for launching new features. Both options require a trade-off between reliability and innovation, and should be agreed upon by both teams.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the SRE practices.Option B is incorrect because it violates the principle of error budget autonomy, which means that each service should have its own error budget and SLOs, and should not borrow or reallocate them from other services4. Option C is incorrect because it does not address the root cause of the error budget overspend, and may create unrealistic expectations for the service reliability. Option D is incorrect because it does not prevent the possibility of introducing new errors or bugs with the feature launch, which may further degrade the service quality and user satisfaction.

The correct answer is D. Grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin Identity and Access Management (IAM) role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure1. Cloud Build uses a service account to execute your build steps and access resources, such as Cloud Storage buckets2. Terraform is an open-source tool that allows you to define and provision infrastructure as code3. Terraform uses a state file to store and track the state of your infrastructure4. You can configure Terraform to use a Cloud Storage bucket as a backend to store and share the state file across multiple users or environments5.

The error message indicates that Cloud Build failed to access the Cloud Storage bucket that contains the Terraform state file. This is likely because the Cloud Build service account does not have the necessary permissions to read and write objects in the bucket. To resolve this issue, you need to grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket. This role allows the service account to create, delete, and manage objects in the bucket6. You can use the gcloud command-line tool or the Google Cloud Console to grant this role.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A is incorrect because it changes the Terraform code to use local state, which is not recommended for production or collaborative environments, as it can cause conflicts, data loss, or inconsistency. Option B is incorrect because it creates a new storage bucket with the name specified in the Terraform configuration, but it does not grant any permissions to the Cloud Build service account on the new bucket. Option C is incorrect because it grants the roles/owner IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the project, which is too broad and violates the principle of least privilege. The roles/owner role grants full access to all resources in the project, which can pose a security risk if misused or compromised.

Google always aims to first stop the impact of an incident, and then find the root cause (unless the root cause just happens to be identified early on).

The best option for configuring all current and future Compute Engine instances to collect system logs and ensure that the Ops Agent remains up to date is to use the gcloud CLI to create an Agent Policy. An Agent Policy is a resource that defines how Ops Agents are installed and configured on VM instances that match certain criteria, such as labels or zones. Ops Agents are software agents that collect metrics and logs from VM instances and send them to Cloud Operations products, such as Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging. By creating an Agent Policy, you can ensure that all current and future VM instances that match the policy criteria will have the Ops Agent installed and updated automatically. This way, you can collect system logs from all VM instances and use them to generate dashboards in Cloud Operations.

Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Cloud Build can import source code from Google Cloud Storage, Cloud Source Repositories, GitHub, or Bitbucket, execute a build to your specifications, and produce artifacts such as Docker containers or Java archives1. Cloud Build can also run integration tests as part of your build steps2.

You can use Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder by specifying the path to the folder in the dir field of your build step3. For example, if you have a folder named tests that contains your integration tests, you can use the following build step to run them:

steps:

- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/go'

args: ['test', '-v']

dir: 'tests'

Copy

You can use Cloud Build to trigger builds for every GitHub pull request by using the Cloud Build GitHub app. The app allows you to automatically build on Git pushes and pull requests and view your build results on GitHub and Google Cloud console4. You can configure the app to run builds on specific branches, tags, or paths5. For example, if you want to run builds on pull requests that target the master branch, you can use the following trigger configuration:

includedFiles:

- '**'

name: 'pull-request-trigger'

github:

name: 'my-repo'

owner: 'my-org'

pullRequest:

branch: '^master$'

Using Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder and trigger builds for every GitHub pull request is a good way to continuously test your feature branch and ensure that all code is tested before changes areaccepted. This way, you can catch any errors or bugs early and prevent them from affecting the main branch.

Using a Jenkins server for CI/CD pipelines is not a bad option, but it would require more setup and maintenance than using Cloud Build, which is fully managed by Google Cloud. Periodically running all tests in the feature branch is not as efficient as running tests for every pull request, as it may delay the feedback loop and increase the risk of conflicts or failures.

Using Cloud Build to run the tests after a pull request is merged is not a good practice, as it may introduce errors or bugs into the main branch that could have been prevented by testing before merging.

Asking the pull request reviewers to run the integration tests before approving the code is not a reliable way of ensuring code quality, as it depends on human intervention and may be prone to errors or oversights.

Scaling App Engine scales the number of instances automatically in response to processing volume. This scaling factors in the automatic_scaling settings that are provided on a per-version basis in the configuration file. A service with basic scaling is configured by setting the maximum number of instances in the max_instances parameter of the basic_scaling setting. The number of live instances scales with the processing volume. You configure the number of instances of each version in that service's configuration file. The number of instances usually corresponds to the size of a dataset being held in memory or the desired throughput for offline work. You can adjust the number of instances of a manually-scaled version very quickly, without stopping instances that are currently running, using the Modules API set_num_instances function.https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/how-instances-are-managed

https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/config/appref

max_idle_instances Optional. The maximum number of idle instances that App Engine should maintain for this version. Specify a value from 1 to 1000. If not specified, the default value is automatic, which means App Engine will manage the number of idle instances. Keep the following in mind: A high maximum reduces the number of idle instances more gradually when load levels return to normal after a spike. This helps your application maintain steady performance through fluctuations in request load, but also raises the number of idle instances (and consequent running costs) during such periods of heavy load.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General Google Cloud Knowledge:

App Hub allows you to organize and discover services and applications within your Google Cloud environment. For App Hub to recognize and display resources as components of an "application," these resources often need to be explicitly registered or discovered as "services" within that application's configuration. While App Hub can automatically discover some resources (like GKE workloads, Cloud Run services), for other resources, or to establish specific relationships, manual registration or more detailed configuration is sometimes required.

Option A (Attach the project containing the forwarding rule as an App Hub service project): While App Hub works across projects (host project for the application, service projects for services and workloads), simply attaching the project might not be sufficient for App Hub to automatically pick up and categorize every resource like a forwarding rule specifically for a defined application without further context. The forwarding rule needs to be associated with a service within the App Hub application.

Option B (Enable the App Hub API in the project containing the forwarding rule): The App Hub API needs to be enabled in projects where you want to manage App Hub resources (applications, services, workloads). If it wasn't enabled, you likely wouldn't be able to see any resources from that project. Since other resources are visible, this is less likely the root cause for a single missing resource, though it's a prerequisite for App Hub to function at all with that project.

Option C (Configure the forwarding rule to forward to the correct target proxy): While correct configuration of the forwarding rule is essential for its operational functionality, App Hub's ability to list the forwarding rule is more about its discovery and registration within App Hub's model rather than its traffic-directing correctness. An incorrectly configured forwarding rule that is properly registered might still appear in App Hub, perhaps with an error status.

Option D (Register the forwarding rule as a service in the application configuration): App Hub applications are composed of "services," and these services are in turn composed of "workloads" or other discovered/registered resources. A forwarding rule is typically an entry point or part of the infrastructure for a service. Explicitly registering it or the resource it points to (which then allows App Hub to trace back to the forwarding rule) as a service or part of a service within the application configuration would make it visible and properly cataloged by App Hub. App Hub discovers resources by looking for specific labels or by manual registration. If it's not automatically discovered as part of a recognized workload (like a GCE instance group service exposed via a load balancer), explicit registration is often the way to make it appear.

Reference (Based on general App Hub functionality):

App Hub discovers resources that are part of registered applications and their services. Services in App Hub can be based on various Google Cloud resources. If a resource like a forwarding rule isn't automatically linked to a displayed workload, it might need to be explicitly defined as a service or part of a service.

From the Google Cloud documentation on App Hub concepts:

"Applications are the core organizational unit in App Hub. An application represents a logical system that delivers business value... Services represent the logical components of an application... Workloads are instances of your services running on Google Cloud infrastructure. App Hub automatically discovers workloads for supported resource types or you can manually register them."

Forwarding rules are associated with load balancing, which exposes services. If the service that the forwarding rule points to is correctly registered and identified by App Hub, associated infrastructure like the forwarding rule should typically be discoverable. If it's not, ensuring the service it fronts is correctly registered and that App Hub understands this link is key. Option D aligns with this concept of ensuring the relevant component (which the forwarding rule is part of) is registered within the application structure.

You can find more information in the official Google Cloud documentation regarding App Hub:

App Hub overview: https://cloud.google.com/app-hub/docs/overview

Registering services and workloads: Documentation would detail how different resources are discovered or need to be registered.

The best option for minimizing the number of log sinks created and ensuring that the log sinks apply to future projects is to create an aggregated log sink in the Dev and Prod folders. An aggregated log sink is a log sink that collects logs from multiple sources, such as projects, folders, or organizations. By creating an aggregated log sink in each folder, you can export log entries for development projects to dev_dataset and log entries for production projects to prod_dataset. You can also use filters to specify which logs you want to export. Additionally, by creating an aggregated log sink at the folder level, you can ensure that the log sink applies to future projects that are created under that folder.

The most cost-effective network tier and load balancing configuration for your frontend tier is to use Premium Tier with a regional load balancer. Premium Tier is a network tier that provides high-performance and low-latency network connectivity across Google’s global network. A regional load balancer is a load balancer that distributes traffic within a single region. Since your application is deployed entirely within the europe-west2 region and only serves users based in the United Kingdom, you can use Premium Tier with a regional load balancer to optimize the network performance and cost.

Your application runs on Google Cloud Platform (GCP). You need to implement Jenkins for deploying application releases to GCP. You want to streamline the release process, lower operational toil, and keep user data secure. What should you do?

https://plugins.jenkins.io/google-compute-engine/

The best option for deploying a containerized web application to Google Cloud with the given acceptance criteria is to use Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) with Anthos Service Mesh. GKE is a managed service for running Kubernetes clusters on Google Cloud, and Anthos Service Mesh is a service mesh that provides observability, traffic management, and security features for microservices. With Anthos Service Mesh, you can use traffic splitting to direct traffic from Android devices to an Android-specific microservice by configuring the user-agent header in the virtual service. You can also use traffic splitting to direct arbitrary percentage-based traffic to different versions of any microservice for continuous testing. For example, you can use a canary release strategy to direct 10% of user traffic to a new version of a microservice and monitor its performance and reliability.

The correct answer is B. Store the password in Secret Manager and mount the secret as a volume within the application.

Secret Manager is a service that allows you to securely store and manage sensitive data such as passwords, API keys, certificates, and tokens.You can use Secret Manager to rotate your secrets automatically or manually, and access them from your Cloud Run applications1.

There are two ways to use secrets from Secret Manager in Cloud Run:

As environment variables: You can set environment variables that point to secrets in Secret Manager. Cloud Run will resolve the secrets at runtime and inject them into the environment of your application. However, this method has some limitations, such as:

The environment variables are cached for up to 10 minutes, so you may not get the latest version of the secret immediately.

The environment variables are visible in plain text in the Cloud Console and the Cloud SDK, which may expose sensitive information.

The environment variables are limited to 4 KB of data, which may not be enough for some secrets.2

As file system volumes: You can mount secrets from Secret Manager as files in a volume within your application. Cloud Run will create a tmpfs volume and write the secrets as files in it. This method has some advantages, such as:

The files are updated every 30 seconds, so you can get the latest version of the secret faster.

The files are not visible in the Cloud Console or the Cloud SDK, which provides better security.

The files can store up to 64 KB of data, which allows for larger secrets.3

Therefore, for your use case, it is better to use the second method and mount the secret as a file system volume within your application. This way, you can ensure that your application has the latest password, and you can deploy it with no downtime.

To mount a secret as a file system volume in Cloud Run, you can use the following command:

gcloud beta run deploy SERVICE --image IMAGE_URL --update-secrets=/path/to/file=secretName:version

where:

SERVICE is the name of your Cloud Run service.

IMAGE_URL is the URL of your container image.

/path/to/file is the path where you want to mount the secret file in your application.

secretName is the name of your secret in Secret Manager.

version is the version of your secret.You can uselatestto get the most recent version.3

You can also use the Cloud Console to mount secrets as file system volumes. For more details, seeMounting secrets from Secret Manager.

https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/access-control

The best option for updating the instance template and minimizing disruption to the application and the number of pipeline runs is to set the create_before_destroy meta-argument to true in the lifecycle block on the instance template. The create_before_destroy meta-argument is a Terraform feature that specifies that a new resource should be created before destroying an existing one during an update. This way, you can avoid downtime and errors when updating a resource that is in use by another resource, such as an instance template that is used by a managed instance group. By setting the create_before_destroy meta-argument to true in the lifecycle block on the instance template, you can ensure that Terraform creates a new instance template with the updated machine type, updates the managed instance group to use the new instance template, and then deletes the old instance template.

The best option for selecting a deployment and testing strategy that meets your requirements is to use blue/green deployment and canary testing. A blue/green deployment is a deployment strategy that involves creating two identical environments, one running the current version of the application (blue) and one running the new version of the application (green). The traffic is switched from blue to green after testing the new version, and if any issues are discovered, the traffic can be switched back to blue instantly. This way, you can reduce the complexity of release deployments and minimize the duration of deployment rollbacks. A canary testing is a testing strategy that involves releasing a new version of an application to a subset of users or servers and monitoring its performance and reliability. This way, you can test real production traffic with a gradual increase in the number of affected users.

The best option for deploying a new release of your microservice on Cloud Run and testing it extensively in the staging and production environments with minimal user and developer impact is to deploy the new version of the service to the staging environment with a new-release tag without serving traffic, test the new-release version, and if the test passes, gradually roll out this tagged version. A tag is a label that you can assign to a revision of your service on Cloud Run. You can use tags to create different versions of your service without affecting traffic. You can also use tags to gradually roll out traffic to a new version of your service by using traffic splitting. This way, you can test your new release extensively in both environments and minimize user and developer impact.

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/automated-canary-analysis-kubernetes-engine-spinnaker

https://spinnaker.io/guides/user/canary/best-practices/#compare-canary-against-baseline-not-against-production

https://cloud.google.com/anthos/clusters/docs/on-prem/1.7/concepts/logging-and-monitoring

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Cloud Deploy is a GCP-native managed CI/CD tool for reliable and automated releases across environments.

Artifact Registry Cleanup Policy automates image retention and deletion of old images, reducing storage costs and avoiding clutter.

Rollback and rollback policies should be handled by Cloud Deploy, not manual interventions.

????Why not other options?

A❌→ Cloud Build jobs for cleanup are not scalable or automated compared to Artifact Registry policies.

B❌→ Cloud Service Mesh is not related to deployment rollbacks or image cleanup.

D❌→ Cloud Deploy provides better rollback management than a custom rollback pipeline.

????Official Reference:

Google Cloud Deploy Overview

Artifact Registry Cleanup Policy

The most probable cause of the database timeout is an increased number of connections to the Cloud SQL instance. This could happen if the application does not close connections properly or if it creates too many connections at once. You can check the number of connections to the Cloud SQL instance using Cloud Monitoring or Cloud SQL Admin API .

The correct answer is B. Cloud Infrastructure (Terraform) repository is shared: different directories are different environments. GKE Infrastructure (Anthos Config Management Kustomize manifests) repositories are separated: different branches are different environments. Application (app source code) repositories are separated: different branches are different features.

This answer follows the best practices for using Terraform and Anthos Config Management with GitOps, as described in the following sources:

For Terraform, it is recommended to use a single repository for all environments, and use directories to separate them. This way, you can reuse the same Terraform modules and configurations across environments, and avoid code duplication and drift.You can also use Terraform workspaces to isolate the state files for each environment12.

For Anthos Config Management, it is recommended to use separate repositories for each environment, and use branches to separate the clusters within each environment. This way, you can enforce different policies and configurations for each environment, and use pull requests to promote changes across environments.You can also use Kustomize to create overlays for each cluster that apply specific patches or customizations34.

For application code, it is recommended to use separate repositories for each application, and use branches to separate the features or bug fixes for each application. This way, you can isolate the development and testing of each application, and use pull requests to merge changes into the main branch.You can also use tags or labels to trigger deployments to different environments5.

The correct answer is B. Use shadow testing with continuous deployment.

Shadow testing is a deployment technique that involves routing a copy of the live traffic to a new version of the application, without affecting the production environment. This way, you can gather performance metrics and compare them with the current version, without exposing the new version to the users. Shadow testing can help you test against the full production load and identify any issues or bottlenecks before launching the new version. You can use continuous deployment to automate the process of deploying the new version after it passes the shadow testing.

The correct answer is D. Option D.

According to the DevOps best practices, a joint-ownership model for a service between the DevOps team and the Software Development team should follow these principles12:

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should share the responsibility and collaboration for managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should have end-to-end ownership of the service, from design to development to deployment to operation to maintenance.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should use common tools and processes to facilitate communication, coordination, and feedback.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should align their goals and incentives with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction.

Option D is the only option that reflects these principles. Option D assigns both teams the responsibilities of managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service. Option D also implies that both teams have end-to-end ownership of the service, as they are involved in every stage of the service lifecycle.Option D also encourages both teams to use common tools and processes, such as GitLab3, to collaborate and communicate effectively. Option D also aligns both teams with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction, as they use SLOs to measure and improve the service quality.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the DevOps best practices. Option A is incorrect because it assigns only the DevOps team the responsibility of managing the service infrastructure, which creates a silo between the two teams and reduces their collaboration. Option A also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option B is incorrect because it assigns only the Software Development team the responsibility of performing code reviews, which creates a gap between the two teams and reduces their feedback. Option B also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option C is incorrect because it assigns both teams the same responsibilities as option A and option B, which combines their drawbacks.

https://sre.google/sre-book/service-level-objectives/

OOMKilled means the containers exceeded their allocated memory. Since the HPA isn't scaling up (stuck at min), this indicates the issue is not scale-related but container memory limits are too low.

"Pods terminated with OOMKilled have exceeded their memory limits. You should adjust the container's resource requests and limits."

— Kubernetes OOMKill Debug Guide

Scaling the number of replicas won't help if each replica crashes. You need to increase memory limits so pods can run reliably before autoscaling can even work.

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/customizing-stackdriver-logs-fluentd

Besides the list of default logs that the Logging agent streams by default, you can customize the Logging agent to send additional logs to Logging or to adjust agent settings by adding input configurations. The configuration definitions in these sections apply to the fluent-plugin-google-cloud output plugin only and specify how logs are transformed and ingested into Cloud Logging.https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/agent/logging/configuration#configure

Reason : Incident has not occurred yet, even when development team is already pushing new features multiple times a week. The option A says, to define an error budget "policy", not to define error budget(It is already present). Just simple means to bring in all stakeholders, and decide how to consume the error budget effectively that could bring balance between feature deployment and reliability.

The goals of this policy are to: -- Protect customers from repeated SLO misses -- Provide an incentive to balance reliability with other featureshttps://sre.google/workbook/error-budget-policy/

https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview

The best options for reducing toil in the pipeline and minimizing the amount of time it takes to complete an end-to-end deployment are to create a trigger to notify the required team to complete the next step when manual intervention is required and to automate promotion approvals from the development environment to the test environment. A trigger is a resource that initiates a deployment when an event occurs, such as a code change, a schedule, or a manual request. You can create a trigger to notify the required team to complete the next step when manual intervention is required by using Cloud Build or Cloud Functions. This way, you can reduce the waiting time and human errors in the pipeline. A promotion approval is a process that allows you to approve or reject a deployment from one environment to another, such as from development to test. You can automate promotion approvals from the development environment to the test environment by using Google Cloud Deploy or Cloud Build. This way, you can speed up the deployment process and avoid manual steps.

The best option for managing all charts uniformly, with native access control and VPC Service Controls is to store public and private charts in OCI format by using Artifact Registry. Artifact Registry is a service that allows you to store and manage container images and other artifacts in Google Cloud. Artifact Registry supports OCI format, which is an open standard for storing container images and other artifacts such as Helm charts. You can use Artifact Registry to store public and private charts in OCI format and manage them uniformly. You can also use Artifact Registry’s native access control features, such as IAM policies and VPC Service Controls, to secure your charts and control who can access them.

For a postmortem to be truly blameless, it must focus on identifying the contributing causes of the incident without indicting any individual or team for bad or inappropriate behavior.