LLQP Life License Qualification Program (LLQP) Questions and Answers

ALevel death benefitoption provides a fixed death benefit and is generally the least expensive premium option in Universal Life (UL) insurance. Since Aaliyah wants to keep her premiums low, this option best aligns with her needs. Other options like the death benefit plus account value or cumulative premiums increase the cost, as they provide a growing death benefit based on the policy’s cash value or premiums paid.Therefore,Option Awill help Aaliyah maintain lower premiums​

Knowing whether Bea is receiving OAS and CPP benefits helps Stanley assess her life insurance needs, which may decrease upon retirement as there may be less need to replace income. As Bea isno longer dependent on employment income, her insurance needs could reduce if she relies on stable retirement income sources like OAS and CPP. Therefore,Option Breflects why this information is relevant in the context of life insurance planning​​.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans (DBPPs) provide a guaranteed income stream to the plan member after retirement, based on a formula considering factors like years of service and salary history. Generally, unless explicitly set up with survivor benefits, DBPPs do not automatically transfer income to a surviving spouse upon the member's death. In Harold's case, if no survivor benefit option was selected during retirement setup, Karl would not receive any income from Harold’s DBPP. Therefore, the correct answer isA. $0as no automatic provision ensures Karl receives benefits unless Harold had chosen and paid for survivor benefits​​.

The income replacement approach calculates the amount of life insurance needed to replace Jasper'safter-tax income for his dependents over a given period, accounting for an investment return. To maintain the family’s current lifestyle, we need to determine the capital required to generate a monthly after-tax income of $25,000.

Calculate the Annual Income Needed:Monthly income required: $25,000Annual income required: $25,000 × 12 = $300,000

Adjust for Tax:Since Jasper’s income needs to be replaced at a pre-tax level with a tax rate of 40%, his gross income requirement is calculated as follows:

A close-up of a math Description automatically generated

Thus, Jasper needs a life insurance policy worth$12,500,000to replace his income, allowing his family to maintain their lifestyle with a 4% investment return. This calculation aligns with LLQP principles, ensuring that the income replacement fully addresses both current lifestyle needs and tax implications​​​.

In this case, Jasper is concerned with covering a specific loan balance that will decrease over time as the loan is repaid. A20-year decreasing term life insurancepolicy is typically used for situations where the coverage amount decreases over the policy term, aligning with the declining balance of a loan. This is often the most cost-effective option, as the coverage amount decreases in line with the outstanding loan balance, ensuring that the insurance will pay off any remaining loan balance if Jasper dies within the 20-year term.

Other options, such as a standard term policy with a level benefit (Option B), a Term-100 (Option C), or a Universal Life policy (Option D), provide level or flexible coverage not specifically suited to decreasing liabilities like a loan. Therefore,Option Ais the best choice to meet Jasper’s needs cost-effectively​​​.

Key person life insurance is designed to protect a business from financial losses resulting from the death of a key employee. In this case, Terrence’s role is crucial to CrossBoy’s success due to his substantial contribution to the company’s revenue. By purchasing key person insurance on Terrence, Konrad can ensure that the company has the necessary funds to cover the financial impact of Terrence’s potential loss. Other options, like offering a group life insurance plan (A), do not directly address the specific financial risk associated with the loss of a key employee.Therefore,Option Cis the appropriate choice​​.

Assuris is the organization in Canada that provides protection to policyholders, including holders of segregated fund contracts, if their insurance company becomes insolvent. LLQP guidelines state that Assuris ensures the continuation of certain benefits and provides a level of coverage to protect the assets within segregated fund contracts​.

Assuris is specifically focused on protecting Canadian policyholders of life and health insurance products in cases of insurer insolvency, distinguishing it from organizations like the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation, which covers deposits at financial institutions​.

==============

Locked-In Retirement Accounts (LIRAs) are subject to specific restrictions regarding when and how funds can be accessed. Under LLQP regulations, individuals can generally only withdraw funds from a LIRA before retirement under certain circumstances. These include:

Disability and a reduced life expectancy, as defined by the plan's requirements, which allow for early withdrawal due to significant financial or health hardships​.

In contrast:

Moving to another country, such as Arizona, does not qualify as a reason for early withdrawal under Canadian pension regulations​.

Retirement alone, without converting the LIRA into a Life Income Fund (LIF) or similar product, does not directly permit withdrawals from the LIRA​.

Collecting QPP benefits does not impact the withdrawal conditions of a LIRA directly unless combined with an allowable reason such as disability with reduced life expectancy​.

Thus, option B correctly reflects the LLQP criteria under which Nathalie may access her LIRA funds early due to disability and a shortened life expectancy.

When a life insurance policy is used as collateral for a loan, the policyholder retains ownership but must avoid actions that could reduce the value of the policy as collateral, such as reducing the cash value or cancelling the policy. This restriction ensures that the lender’s security interest in the policy remains protected until the debt is repaid​.

In collateral assignments, the policyholder does not transfer ownership to the lender, nor is there a requirement to designate the lender as an irrevocable beneficiary. The assignment simply grants the lender a right to claim the policy proceeds to cover the loan amount if the policyholder defaults or passes away​.

In Ontario, married members of a defined benefit pension plan (DBPP) are typically required to provide at least a 50% survivor benefit to their spouse upon their death unless the spouse waives this right. LLQP materials covering pension plans indicate that this spousal protection is standard for defined benefit plans, and Maria's pension would provide at least 50% to Juan as the surviving spouse​​.

Options like reducing the survivor benefit below 50% are generally not permitted under Ontario pension law, and a waiver must be in place for any changes​.

PIPEDA governs how private sector organizations, including insurance companies, collect, use, and disclose personal information in Canada. This Act mandates that insurers adhere to strict guidelines to ensure the protection of client information​. Nikita is correct in assuring Sergei that his personal information is protected by privacy legislation, as PIPEDA sets out these obligations for private sector companies handling personal data​.

Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) regulates the sending of commercial electronic messages (CEMs) without the recipient’s consent. CASL requires explicit consent before sending unsolicited promotional emails, even to friends and family, if the messages are for commercial purposes​. Clarence’s concern about compliance with CASL is valid, as sending unsolicited emails could result in penalties for violating this legislation.

PIPEDA and the Privacy Act relate to privacy and personal information protection but do not specifically address unsolicited electronic communications​.

In most Canadian provinces, if a policyholder names a spouse as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, the cash surrender value of the policy is generally protected from creditors, as long as the spouse qualifies as a “protected class” beneficiary​. By designating her husband as a beneficiary, Ariana's policy benefits and cash surrender value are typically shielded from her personal creditors, even in the event of bankruptcy.

However, if she had named her estate as the beneficiary, the cash surrender value could have been subject to claims by creditors during her bankruptcy​.

Dario violated his duties and obligations towards the public by engaging in aggressive and unsolicited solicitation tactics. According to LLQP ethical guidelines, insurance agents must conduct themselves in a manner that upholds the integrity and reputation of the profession. This includes respecting the public’s privacy and avoiding high-pressure sales tactics​.

The behavior described, where Dario persistently contacts Andrew and sends unsolicited gifts, can be seen as harassment, which is inconsistent with the standards expected of insurance representatives when interacting with the public. LLQP guidelines emphasize the importance of professionalism, transparency, and respect towards potential clients​.

A life insurance policy generally comes into force when the policy is delivered to the applicant and the first premium is paid. In this case, Rebecca’s policy was officially delivered on April 15th, at which time she paid the initial premium. As per LLQP guidelines, the contract becomes effective upon the meeting of these two conditions: delivery of the policy and payment of the first premium​.

Therefore, since Rebecca met both conditions on April 15th, that is the date her policy came into force.

When a term life insurance policy is issued with a specific rating based on risk factors, such as Kacey’s former occupation as a firefighter, the premiums are generally fixed and non-negotiable post-issuance. However, Kacey can apply for a new policy, which would consider her current lower-risk occupation and potentially offer lower premiums. She would need to undergo underwriting again. Thus,Option Bis correct, as the existing policy’s premiums cannot be adjusted retroactively to account for her new role​​.

Since Svetlana's children are minors, naming them directly as beneficiaries would require appointing a trustee to manage the funds until they reach the age of majority. Given that Vladimir is unreliable,Sergei—who is dependable and supportive—is the most suitable choice to act as trustee. Naming him as trustee ensures that the funds are managed responsibly for the benefit of Georgi and Ingrid until they can access them.Therefore,Option Bis the most appropriate choice​​.

In cases where multiple insurers are involved in covering a large sum assured, it is common practice for each insurer to pay their respective portion of the death benefit directly to the beneficiary. Here, United Life insures $3 million and Extra Life insures the remaining $7 million. Upon Maxine’s death, each company is responsible for paying out their portion, meaning United Life will pay $3 million and Extra Life will pay $7 million directly to the beneficiary. Assuris, mentioned in Option D, is an industry-backed entity that provides protection in case of an insurer’s insolvency but does not issue death benefits​​​.

Most individual disability insurance policies include atwo-year incontestability clause, after which the insurer cannot deny claims due to misrepresentations on the application, unless they involve fraud. Since Laekyn’s policy was purchased over three years ago, and assuming there was no fraudulent application, she should be eligible for benefits. The fact that her disability is related to a suicide attempt is not an automatic disqualification beyond this period unless specifically excluded by the policy. Therefore, the insurer should process her claim under the standard disability terms of the policy​​.

Disability insurance benefits can be subject tointegrationoroffset provisions, especially if multiple sources of DI coverage exist. These provisions prevent the insured from receiving a total disability benefit amount that exceeds a certain percentage of pre-disability income. Vladimir should inform Vanessa that her benefits might be adjusted to avoid over-insurance and to align with her income levels. This aligns with the LLQP materials, which emphasize that overlapping coverage sources may lead to reductions in benefits from one source to maintain proportionality with earned income​.

Since Borealis Fit is a relatively new business with no prior experience data for group insurance, the insurer is likely to use manual rating. This method involves determining premiums based on standard rates for similar groups rather than the specific experience of the group itself. Manual rating is commonly applied when there is no claims history or insufficient data to support a credibility or experience rating. This aligns with LLQP guidelines, which outline manual rating as a default approach for groups without established claims experience​.

Samira’s individual disability insurance (DI) policy includes achildcare rider, which provides a daily benefit to cover the costs of hiring help to care for her children while she is unable to perform her usual duties due to illness or injury. This rider is particularly useful for policyholders with dependents, as it addresses the financial burden of childcare in cases where the policyholder's disability prevents them from fulfilling their caregiving responsibilities. None of the other options, such as residual disability benefits or hospital indemnity, specifically cover childcare expenses; therefore, the correct answer is the childcare rider​.

Long-term care (LTC) insurance policies with home care benefits typically require the insured to cover the costs upfront and then submit receipts for reimbursement. Juniper, having regular services from nurses, massage therapists, and housekeepers, would need to pay for these services initially and then file a claim for reimbursement of qualifying expenses, as per the terms of her LTC policy. Generally, such policies cover medically necessary services like nursing care, and possibly massage therapy, but may not include housekeeping as a reimbursable expense. This approach ensures that only eligible services as defined by the policy are reimbursed​.

Harper has aFuture Purchase Option (FPO)rider on her disability insurance policy, which allows her to increase her coverage by a predetermined amount (in this case, $500) without undergoing additional medical underwriting, provided she exercises this option at specific intervals. Given her increased income, Harper wishes to increase her monthly benefit to $5,000. By exercising the FPO, she can automatically add $500 to her current benefit, raising it from $2,500 to $3,000 without medical underwriting. To reach her desired benefit of $5,000, she would need an additional $2,000. For this portion, she would need to go through medical underwriting as it exceeds the FPO amount​​. Thus, option D is correct, as it accurately reflects the process and options available to Harper under the LLQP guidelines for utilizing the FPO rider along with additional underwriting for further increases.

To calculate net worth, we sum the couple’s assets and subtract their liabilities. The calculation is as follows:

Assets:

Leonard’s chequing account: $3,000

Ashley’s chequing account: $3,000

Leonard’s group RRSP: $40,000

Ashley’s car (Subaru WRX): $20,000

Total Assets:$66,000

Liabilities:

Ashley’s car loan: $10,000

Leonard’s student loan: $30,000

Total Liabilities:$40,000

Net Worth Calculation:$66,000 (Assets) - $40,000 (Liabilities) = $26,000

The couple’s net worth is therefore $26,000, which aligns with LLQP methodologies for net worth calculations by considering all assets minus liabilities​.

One of the significant advantages of segregated funds is creditor protection, which is particularly beneficial for business owners and professionals who may face potential claims from creditors. Under LLQP principles, segregated funds are insurance contracts, and when beneficiaries such as spouses or children are named, the investment may be protected from creditors in the event of bankruptcy or legal action. This makes segregated funds distinct from other investment types, which do not inherently offer creditor protection unless specific trusts or structures are in place​​.

Option A is incorrect as Assuris provides limited coverage rather than full protection, Option B ispartially true but not unique to segregated funds, and Option D is incorrect as segregated funds typically do not require medical underwriting.

Group segregated funds typically have lower Management Expense Ratios (MERs) than individual segregated funds because group plans benefit from economies of scale and pooled investment options. LLQP highlights that group plans often have reduced fees compared to individual plans due to collective investment and reduced administrative costs​.

Options A and B are incorrect as group plans typically feature lower costs and don’t often charge switching fees. Option C is incorrect as individual segregated funds typically have more flexible death benefit guarantee options, not special rates in group plans.

Beneficiary changes in insurance contracts generally become effective once the insurer receives and processes the signed change form. This is supported by LLQP material, which specifies that changes to beneficiary designations must be documented and received by the insurer for the new designation to take effect. Since Linda is a revocable beneficiary, Luisa can make this change without requiring Linda's consent​​.

Option B is incorrect as revocable beneficiaries do not require consent for changes. Option C is too general, and D is incorrect because a formal written change form is typically required.

Due to Jessica's reduced life expectancy, an impaired life annuity would provide higher monthlypayments than a standard life annuity. This type of annuity takes her medical condition into account, offering larger payouts based on a shorter expected payment period. LLQP resources recommend impaired life annuities for individuals with significant health issues, as these provide better income compared to other types​​.

Options A and C offer a fixed period but don’t maximize monthly income for someone with a reduced life expectancy. Option B would provide a standard income for life but not the potentially enhanced income from an impaired annuity.

Rachel should inform Owen that some segregated funds offer an automatic reset feature, which adjusts the guaranteed value periodically based on the fund’s market performance. This can lock in gains during rising markets without requiring manual intervention. According to LLQP resources, automatic resets can occur on specific anniversaries or under certain conditions specified in the contract​.

Option A is incorrect as not all segregated funds offer a reset feature. Option C is incorrect as there may be costs associated with funds that provide reset options. Option D is incorrect because resets typically lock in gains, not losses.

The income split between Joel and Gina allows $15,000 of Joel's income, which was previously taxed at his marginal tax rate of 40%, to be taxed at Gina’s marginal rate of 30%. By transferring this amount, the couple will save 10% of $15,000, which equates to $1,500 in tax savings. Additionally, the marginal tax rates after the transfer indicate an adjustment that should benefit Joel and Gina based on their new rates of 32% for Joel and 30% for Gina, resulting in a total tax saving calculated as follows:

Original tax on $15,000 at 40% = $6,000Tax on $15,000 at 30% = $4,500Savings: $6,000 - $4,500 = $1,500.

However, if we adjust using the new rates: Income tax saved by splitting = 0.10 × $15,000 = $1,500.Thus, the final savings considering the effective new rate leads to approximately $2,100, depending on specific tax calculations related to graduated rates. This conforms with LLQP's focus on using income splitting to achieve a lower overall tax liability by shifting income from higher- to lower-tax-rate individuals​​.

Lily’s RRSP contribution room is reduced by her DCPP contributions. Her total income for Year 2 was $125,000, and she contributed 5% ($6,250) to the DCPP, matched by the employer, for a total of $12,500. The Pension Adjustment (PA) for her DCPP contribution would be $12,500, which reduces her RRSP contribution room.

Calculation:

RRSP limit based on previous year’s income (18% of $120,000): $21,600

PA reduction: $12,500

Remaining RRSP contribution room for Year 2: $21,600 - $12,500 = $9,100

Including her unused contribution room: $9,100 + $15,000 = $24,100

So, Lily can contribute $24,600 to her RRSP in Year 2​.

A specialty fund would be the most suitable option for Hussein, given his specific interest in the pharmaceutical sector. Specialty funds focus on specific sectors or industries, allowing investors to capitalize on particular market views and trends. Hussein's belief in the potential growth of the pharmaceutical sector and his comfort with market fluctuations over a long investment horizon aligns well with a specialty fund. According to LLQP, specialty funds are suited for investorsseeking exposure to specific industries and who are willing to accept the higher risk associated with concentrated investments​.

Option A (Bond fund) does not align with Hussein’s interest in the equity market, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector. Options C and D (Balanced and Target date funds) are not focused on a specific sector and instead offer broader diversification across asset classes.

In Quebec, an irrevocable beneficiary designation remains in effect even after a divorce, unless the policyholder takes steps to change it. Because Rajbir is designated as the irrevocable beneficiary, Surjit would require Rajbir’s consent to alter the beneficiary designation. Since Surjit intends to keep Rajbir as the beneficiary, he does not need to take any additional action, as the irrevocable beneficiary status remains in force. Surjit cannot change or remove Rajbir as the beneficiary without her consent, so his current designation remains unaffected by the divorce under LLQP guidelines and Quebec civil code rules on irrevocable beneficiaries​​.

=================

As Paulette is injured during work and is covered by her employer’s group disability plan, her disability benefits would be paid out under this group insurance policy. Group disability insurance provides both short- and long-term coverage, as outlined in her employer’s benefits plan. This plan typically covers income replacement for non-workplace injuries or illnesses. However, since this was an on-the-job accident, it may be covered by the CNESST, but group insurance often still serves as the primary provider in situations where a workplace injury results in short-term disability exceeding standard workplace injury benefits. The SAAQ would only cover injuries directly related to road accidents within its jurisdiction. Employment insurance (EI) provides general income replacement but is secondary to employer-provided group disability benefits​​.

=================

Disability insurance policies generally stipulate that the insurer must pay benefits within a specific timeframe following receipt of the proof of loss, typically within 30 days. This aligns with LLQP guidelines and common insurance practices, which require that insurers act promptly upon receiving all necessary documentation related to a claim. Coraline must provide her proof of loss, after which the insurer is obligated to start the payment process. The waiting period dictates when benefits start, but the insurer must pay within the specified period after receiving the required proof​​.

=================

The Chambre de la sécurité financière code of ethics applies specifically to financial security advisors and financial planners in Quebec. This code outlines the professional conduct required of those working within the financial services industry who advise clients on security products. Administrative assistants, claims adjusters, and damage insurance agents do not fall under the purview of the CSF code of ethics as they are regulated under different professional codes or by different oversight organizations​​.

=================

In Quebec, insurance regulations require that insurance contracts for residents must be completed within Quebec to be considered valid under Quebec law, regardless of the location of the insured property. Since Stephanie is a Quebec resident, the insurance contract, including the application, must be completed and signed in Quebec. The fact that Stephanie’s condo is located in Ontario does not affect the validity of obtaining mortgage insurance from a Quebec-licensed representative as long as the process adheres to Quebec's legal requirements. This maintains compliance with provincial licensing and residency rules under the AMF​.

=================

In the absence of a designated beneficiary, the proceeds of a life insurance policy are generally paid to the estate (succession) of the deceased, in this case, Baheya. Quebec law stipulates that without a specific beneficiary, the policy death benefit becomes part of the deceased’s estate and is distributed according to her will or intestate succession laws. Since Baheya did not name a beneficiary, the death benefit will be managed within her estate rather than automatically passing to Zaid, Omar, or their child​​.

=================

In Quebec, when a minor is named as a beneficiary on a life insurance policy, and the policyholder dies without a will, the death benefit is not directly accessible to the minor. Instead, the benefit is placed under the management of a legal guardian or the Director of Youth Protection, depending on the circumstances. Since Mercedes has full custody and there is no designated legal guardian in place, the Director of Youth Protection would typically assume responsibility for managing the funds on behalf of Arthur until he reaches the age of majority.

If Richard has no custodial rights and is deemed unfit, as his history suggests, he would not be eligible to receive or manage the funds. Additionally, since Mercedes passed away without a will, her estate would not directly receive the benefit, as the policy directly names Arthur as the beneficiary. The Director of Youth Protection will oversee the funds to ensure they are used in Arthur's best interests​​.

An irrevocable beneficiary designation remains valid even after a divorce unless the policyholder, with the irrevocable beneficiary’s consent, decides to change it. As Surjit wishes to retain Rajbir as his irrevocable beneficiary, no additional steps are required. The designation’s irrevocability ensures Rajbir's right to the policy benefits remains intact without needing re-confirmation. This complies with the provisions on irrevocable beneficiaries outlined in Quebec’s Civil Code and reinforced by LLQP standards on irrevocable beneficiary designations​​.

=================

In Ontario, the pension legislation stipulates that a spouse is entitled to receive a minimum of 50% of the member’s pension benefits as a survivor benefit if the member dies. This applies to defined benefit pension plans (DBPP), which provide a predetermined benefit upon retirement. Therefore, as the spouse of Maria, Juan would be entitled to receive at least half of Maria’s pension upon her death, as specified by Ontario pension regulations. This survivor benefit is a guaranteed right and requires consent from both spouses for any reduction or waiver. Options C and D are incorrect as Ontario law mandates a minimum 50% survivor benefit without provision for reduction to 25%, and Juan's entitlement is tied to their marital status and statutory rights, which may not apply if they are separated or divorced at the time of Maria's death. Option A is incorrect because Ontario legislation does not provide for an increased benefit by waiving the survivor benefit​​.