ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management ITIL 4 Practitioner: Deployment Management Exam Questions and Answers

ITIL 4’s value stream analysis focuses on understanding the contribution of each step to overall value delivery to identify improvement opportunities. When evaluating workflow steps, the manager should establish what value is created in each step (Option D), as this provides the foundation for assessing whether steps are necessary, effective, or aligned with organizational goals.

Option A (Collect data about what happens in each workflow step):Incorrect, as data collection is part of identifying steps (already done, per the question), not evaluating their value.

Option B (Identify wasteful steps that could be eliminated):Incorrect, as identifying waste is a subsequent action that depends on first understanding the value of each step.

Option C (Define an ideal series of workflow steps for the future):Incorrect, as defining future steps is part of planning improvements, not evaluating current steps.

Option D (Establish what value is created in each workflow step):Correct, as evaluating value per step is critical to understanding the stream’s effectiveness and prioritizing improvements, per ITIL 4.

Suppliers play a key role in supporting deployment management by providing expertise, tools, and services that align with organizational needs. Option A is correct, as suppliers often advise on selecting tools that integrate with the organization’s value streams, ensuring consistency and scalability in deployment practices.

Option A (Advise on the selection of tools that can be used across the organization’s value streams):Correct, as suppliers have industry knowledge and can recommend tools (e.g., CI/CD platforms) that enhance deployment efficiency across multiple value streams, aligning with ITIL 4’s focus on value-driven tool selection.

Option B (Define the practice success factors for deployment management):Incorrect, as defining success factors is an internal responsibility of the organization, based on its goals and context, not a supplier’s role.

Option C (Create deployment models based on those of other organizations):Incorrect, as deployment models should be tailored to the organization’s unique needs, not copied from others, per ITIL 4’s context-specific approach.

Option D (Develop value streams for the organization utilizing deployment management where appropriate):Incorrect, as developing value streams is an internal strategic activity, while suppliers typically provide support through tools or expertise, not by designing value streams.

When a newly developed deployment model cannot be tested due to technical limitations, ITIL 4 emphasizes a risk-based approach to deployment management to ensure stability and minimize disruption. Option C, closely monitoring the first few uses of the new model, aligns with ITIL 4's guidance to proceed cautiously when full testing is not feasible. This approach allows the organization to deploy the model in a controlled environment, observe its performance, and quickly address any issues, thereby reducing risk while gathering real-world data.

Option A (Only use the new model after a way to test it has been found):While testing is ideal, delaying deployment indefinitely until a testing method is found may not be practical, especially if business needs require timely deployment. This option is overly restrictive and does not balance risk with operational demands.

Option B (Carry out test deployments to see if the model works correctly):Conducting test deployments assumes testing is possible, which contradicts the question’s premise that testing cannot be done for technical reasons. This makes the option invalid.

Option C (Closely monitor the first few uses of the new model):This is the most pragmatic approach, as it allows deployment with safeguards like monitoring to mitigate risks, aligning with ITIL’s focus on value delivery and risk management.

Option D (Automate the activities of the new model before it is used):Automating an untested model could amplify risks, as automation without validation may propagate errors across environments.