CCZT Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) Questions and Answers

In the context of a Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) that incorporates Single Packet Authorization (SPA), after successful authentication and authorization, the client typically generates an SPA packet and sends it to the accepting host. This process involves the client creating a specially crafted packet that is designed to be recognized by the accepting host's SDP gateway. Upon receiving and validating the SPA packet, the gateway allows the client to establish a connection to the designated services or resources. This mechanism ensures that only authorized clients can initiate connections, enhancing security by preventing unauthorized access.

ZT project implementation requires prioritization as part of the overall ZT project planning activities. One area to consider is prioritization based on risks, which means that the organization should identify and assess the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts that could affect its assets, operations, and reputation, and prioritize the ZT initiatives that address the most critical and urgent risks. Prioritization based on risks helps to align the ZT project with the business objectives and needs, and optimize the use of resources and time.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Scope, Priority, & Business Case”
• The Zero Trust Journey: 4 Phases of Implementation - SEI Blog, section “Second Phase: Assess”
• Planning for a Zero Trust Architecture: A Planning Guide for Federal …, section “Gap Analysis”

To detect and stop malicious access attempts in real-time within a Zero Trust Architecture, comprehensive audit logging and continuous monitoring are essential. These measures provide visibility into all access attempts and activities within the network, allowing for the early detection of suspicious behavior. By analyzing logs and monitoring network traffic, security teams can identify and respond to potential threats in real-time, preventing unauthorized access and minimizing the impact of any security incidents.

SOAR is a collection of software programs developed to bolster an organization’s cybersecurity posture. SOAR tools can automate the response to security events and incidents by executing predefined workflows or playbooks, which can include tasks such as alert triage, threat detection, containment, mitigation, and remediation. SOAR tools can also orchestrate the integration of various security tools and data sources, and provide centralized dashboards and reporting for security operations.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 23, section 3.2.2
• Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) - Gartner
• Security Automation: Tools, Process and Best Practices - Cynet, section “What are the different types of security automation tools?”
• Introduction to automation in Microsoft Sentinel

In a ZTA, automation and orchestration can increase security by using the following means:

• Infrastructure as code (laC): laC is a practice of managing and provisioning IT infrastructure through code, rather than manual processes or configuration tools1. laC can increase security by enabling consistent, repeatable, and scalable deployment of ZTA components, such as policies, gateways, firewalls, and micro-segments2. laC can also facilitate compliance, auditability, and change management, as well as reduce human errors and configuration drifts3.
• Identity lifecycle management: Identity lifecycle management is a process of managing the creation, modification, and deletion of user identities and their access rights throughout their lifecycle4. Identity lifecycle management can increase security by ensuring that users have the appropriate level of access to resources at any given time, based on the principle of least privilege5. Identity lifecycle management can also automate the provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts, enforce strong authentication and authorization policies, and monitor and audit user activity and behavior6.

References =

• What is Infrastructure as Code? | Cloudflare
• Zero Trust Architecture: Infrastructure as Code
• Infrastructure as Code: Security Best Practices
• What is Identity Lifecycle Management? | One Identity
• Zero Trust Architecture: Identity and Access Management
• Identity Lifecycle Management: A Zero Trust Security Strategy

ZTA models in terms of access decisions are based on the principle of “never trust, always verify”, which means that each access request is handled just-in-time by the policy decision points. The policy decision points are the components in a ZTA that evaluate the policies and the contextual data collected from various sources, such as the user identity, the device posture, the network location, the resource attributes, and the environmental factors, and then generate an access decision. The access decision is communicated to the policy enforcement points, which enforce the decision on the resource. This way, ZTA models apply a consistent access model throughout the environment for all assets, regardless of their location, type, or ownership.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 14, section 2.2.2
• What Is Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)? - F5, section “Policy Engine”
• Zero trust security model - Wikipedia, section “What Is Zero Trust Architecture?”
• Zero Trust Maturity Model | CISA, section “Zero trust security model”

In a ZTA, a policy decision point (PDP) is a logical component that evaluates the incoming signals from an entity requesting access to a resource against a set of access determination criteria, such as identity, context, device, location, and behavior1. A PDP then makes a decision to grant or deny access, or to request additional information or verification, based on the policies defined by the policy administrator1. A policy enforcement point (PEP) is a logical component that uses the incoming signals from the PDP to open or close a connection between the entity and the resource1. A PEP acts as a gateway or intermediary that enforces the decision made by the PDP and prevents unauthorized or risky access2.

References =

• Zero Trust Architecture | NIST
• Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) - Pomerium

Different SDP deployment models have different advantages and disadvantages depending on the organization’s use case, such as the type of resources to be protected, the location of the clients and servers, the network topology, the scalability, the performance, and the security requirements. Network architects should consider their use case before selecting an SDP model that best suits their needs and goals.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 21, section 3.1.2
• 6 SDP Deployment Models to Achieve Zero Trust | CSA, section “Deployment Models Explained”
• Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) and Zero Trust | CSA, page 7, section 3.1
• Why SDP Matters in Zero Trust | SonicWall, section “SDP Deployment Models”

The essential components of an organization’s ongoing risk analysis are assessment frequency, metrics, and data. Assessment frequency refers to how often the organization conducts risk assessments to monitor and measure the effectiveness of the zero trust architecture and policies. Metrics refer to the quantitative and qualitative indicators that are used to evaluate the security posture, performance, and compliance of the zero trust architecture. Data refers to the information that is collected, analyzed, and reported from various sources, such as telemetry, logs, audits, and feedback, to support risk analysis and decision making.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Monitor & Measure”
• How to improve risk management using Zero Trust architecture | Microsoft Security Blog, section “Monitoring and reporting”
• Zero Trust Adoption: Managing Risk with Cybersecurity Engineering and Adaptive Risk Assessment - SEI Blog, section “Continuous Monitoring and Improvement”

SDP mitigates the risk of broken access control by mandating micro-segmentation and implementing least privilege. Micro-segmentation divides the network into smaller, isolated segments that can prevent unauthorized access and contain lateral movement. Least privilege grants the minimum necessary access to users and devices for specific resources, while hiding all other assets from their view. This reduces the attack surface and prevents attackers from exploiting weak or misconfigured access controls

According to NIST, the key mechanisms for defining, managing, and enforcing policies in a ZTA are the policy decision point (PDP), the policy enforcement point (PEP), and the policy information point (PIP). The PDP is the component that evaluates the policies and the contextual data collected from various sources and generates an access decision. The PEP is the component that enforces the access decision on the resource. The PIP is the component that provides the contextual data to the PDP, such as the user identity, the device posture, the network location, the resource attributes, and the environmental factors.

References =

• Zero Trust Architecture Project - NIST Computer Security Resource Center, slide 9
• What Is Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)? - F5, section “Policy Engine”
• Zero Trust Frameworks Architecture Guide - Cisco, page 4, section “Policy Decision Point”

A key architectural consideration that needs to be taken into account while deploying SDP is how SDP deployment fits into existing network topologies and technologies. This is because SDP deployment may require changes or adaptations to the existing network infrastructure, such as routers, switches, firewalls, VPNs, etc. SDP deployment may also affect the network performance, availability, scalability, and resilience. Therefore, it is important to assess the impact and compatibility of SDP deployment with the existing network topologies and technologies, and to plan and design the SDP deployment accordingly.

References = Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) - Cloud Security Alliance, Zero Trust Training (ZTT) - Module 7: Network Infrastructure and SDP

To ensure that only legitimate users can access Software as a Service (SaaS) or Platform as a Service (PaaS) in a Zero Trust framework, implementing robust authentication mechanisms is crucial. Enforcing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and Single Sign-On (SSO) are effective strategies. MFA adds layers of security by requiring users to provide multiple pieces of evidence to verify their identity, making unauthorized access significantly more challenging. SSO simplifies the user experience by allowing users to access multiple services with one set of credentials while maintaining high security standards, particularly when combined with MFA. These measures align with the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify," ensuring that access is granted only after thorough verification of the user's identity.

Business continuity and disaster recovery are the activities of the ZT implementation preparation phase that ensure the resiliency of the organization’s operations in the event of disruption. Business continuity refers to the process of maintaining or restoring the essential functions of the organization during and after a crisis, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a pandemic. Disaster recovery refers to the process of recovering the IT systems, data, and infrastructure that support the business continuity. ZT implementation requires planning and testing the business continuity and disaster recovery strategies and procedures, as well as aligning them with the ZT policies and controls.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Monitor & Measure”
• Zero Trust architecture: a paradigm shift in cybersecurity - PwC, section “Continuous monitoring and improvement”
• Zero Trust Implementation, section “Outline Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) implementation steps”

Asset owners are the ones who will determine valid users, roles, and privileges for accessing data as part of data governance. Asset owners are responsible for defining the data classification, sensitivity, and ownership of the data assets they own. They also have the authority to grant or revoke access to the data assets based on the business needs and the Zero Trust policies.

References = Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) - Cloud Security Alliance, Zero Trust Training (ZTT) - Module 2: Data and Asset Classification