AD0-E906 Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager enhanced connector Expert Questions and Answers

To configure the Enhanced Connector in AEM, including features like automatic project-linked folder creation, comment syncing, and automatic publishing of assets, you should navigate to:

Tools > Workfront Tools > Workfront Tools Configuration: This is where you can access and configure the connector settings within AEM. From there, selecting the configuration and choosingPropertiesin the action bar allows you to adjust the required settings.

Options B and C reference incorrect paths (Cloud Services and Assets), which are not used for the Enhanced Connector configuration.

Refer toAEM’s Enhanced Connector documentationfor step-by-step instructions on accessing and configuring the connector.

To ensure proper functioning of the Enhanced Connector between AEM and Workfront, it is critical that the firewall allows traffic forEvent SubscriptionsandWebhooks:

Event Subscriptions: These are necessary for synchronizing events between Workfront and AEM, such as when assets are modified or when metadata is updated.

Webhooks: Webhooks enable real-time data exchange and notifications between the two systems, allowing instant updates to flow between Workfront and AEM.

Option A (Experience Manager Workflows) is relevant within AEM but not directly tied to firewall configuration for the connector. Option B (Single Sign-On) is a security feature but not specifically tied to the Enhanced Connector’s data synchronization processes.

Refer to theWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor details on the processes that rely on Event Subscriptions and Webhooks.

For a multi-faceted holiday promotion involving several teams and unique workflows, the best way to track the associated assets is to:

Establish the holiday promotion as a Program: This allows all related projects, each corresponding to a specific marketing platform (e.g., social media, email), to be grouped under a single program for easy tracking.

Associate each project with the Program: This ensures that all related assets and workflows are linked to the holiday promotion and can be reported on collectively.

Create a Project-level Custom Form Field: This will capture specific details related to the holiday promotion for each project, allowing for more tailored reporting.

Create a Project Report filtered to the holiday promotion: This report will enable leadership and stakeholders to track the progress of all assets related to the promotion and ensure on-time delivery.

Option A involves creating a Program for each platform, which adds unnecessary complexity. Option B is similar but lacks the specific tracking of custom fields at the project level.

Refer toWorkfront’s documentation on managing Programs and custom formsfor details on setting up and reporting on large campaigns.

In AEM Cloud Service, the correct approach to making changes, even urgent ones, is to update the codebase and deploy it through theCloud Manager pipeline. This ensures that the change is part of the version-controlled, immutable repository and follows best practices for deployment.

Immutable infrastructure: AEMaaCS does not allow direct modifications to production environments (e.g., via CRXDE Lite). All changes must be deployed through Cloud Manager, ensuring consistency and traceability.

Making changes directly on production via CRXDE or deploying one-off fixes using the Package Manager (Options B and C) violates AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure principle and is not supported.

Refer toAdobe Cloud Manager’s documentationfor best practices on deploying urgent fixes in AEM as a Cloud Service.

In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is toshare the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.

Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.

Refer to Workfront’sdocumentation on document sharingfor detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.

To upload a new version of a document and ensure it is available in AEM Assets, the user must select theNew Versionoption in Workfront. This triggers the version control process where the updated file can be uploaded.

By choosing the Experience Manager integration after selectingNew Version, the system ensures that the latest version of the document is sent to AEM Assets, where it will replace the previous version without losing version history.

This workflow supports maintaining version control between Workfront and AEM, ensuring that the most current version of the asset is always available in both systems.

Refer to theWorkfront-AEM Enhanced Connector Guidefor further details on version control and document updates between Workfront and AEM.

In this scenario, the calculated fieldAllowable Daysand theRequired Delivery Dateneed to display on the project. To achieve this:

Allowable Days: This is a calculated field, so it should be set up as a calculated field in the project custom form, which references the difference between theRequest Entry Dateand theRequired Delivery Date.

Required Delivery Date: This is a static field and should be displayed as a text field to ensure that the original requested delivery date is retained.

Option B is incorrect because both fields do not need to be calculated. TheRequired Delivery Dateis already a static value and doesn’t require calculation.

For more information, refer to theWorkfront documentationon setting up calculated fields and text fields in custom forms.

The issue of the custom field not displaying correctly on a component is likely because thenamespace 'myProject'is not registered in AEM. AEM requires that custom namespaces be registered before they can be used for storing metadata properties. Without registering the myProject namespace, the system cannot properly recognize the custom property, leading to issues displaying the value.

Namespace registration: Custom namespaces like myProject need to be defined in AEM before they can be used to store properties.

Option A is incorrect because the text field should accept special characters, and Option B is incorrect unless there is already a conflicting property name, which is not indicated in this scenario.

Refer toAEM documentation on namespace registrationfor steps on how to register a custom namespace in AEM.

When adding the required packages for the Enhanced Connector in AEM, they should be added to theEmbeddedsection of the pom.xml for all subprojects. TheEmbeddedsection is used to define dependencies that need to be bundled with the AEM project, ensuring that the connector's functionality is included in the deployment.

Option A (Tools) is incorrect because this section is used for development tools, not dependencies. Option C (Servers) refers to server configurations, which is unrelated to package embedding.

Refer toAEM Maven project documentationfor more details on embedding packages in the pom.xml file.

To include themountain assetsin the search results for "hiking" and ensure they show up at the top of the search, the best approach is to assign the‘hiking’ tagto these assets. By using tags, you can enhance the discoverability of the assets without modifying their titles or descriptions. Tags are indexed and have a strong influence on search results in AEM.

Tagging assetsis an efficient way to associate them with relevant topics or keywords, such as "hiking," which would improve their ranking in search results.

Option A suggests using "search boosting," which does not exist in AEM's metadata editor. Option C involves adding "hiking" to the content and status fields, which isn't the best way to influence search ranking and could clutter the metadata.

Refer toAEM documentation on metadata tagging and search optimizationfor more details.

If themulti-value text fieldis being populated unexpectedly, the most likely cause is thatanother field in the metadata schema is mapped to the same property. When multiple fields are mapped to the same property in AEM, any updates to either field will overwrite or modify the property, leading to the unexpected population of values.

This can happen due to schema misconfiguration, where fields unintentionally share the same JCR property path.

Option B is incorrect because the value being required would not cause it to be populated automatically. Option C suggests simultaneous updates by different users, which is unlikely to cause the issue described.

Check themetadata schema configurationto ensure fields are mapped to distinct properties.

When a new metadata profile is applied to a folder in AEM, itonly affects new assetsadded to that folderafterthe profile is applied. Existing assets that were already in the folder or subfolders prior to the profile being assigned will retain the metadata profile that was previously applied.

To update the metadata of existing assets with the new profile, you would need to either manually update the assets or run a script to reapply the metadata profile to those assets.

Option B is incorrect because the profile applies to all assets in the folder, not just direct children. Option C is incorrect because if there were invalid field values, you would likely see an error or warning, rather than a silent failure.

For more details, refer to AEM’sdocumentation on managing and applying metadata profiles.

In this case, since the user is reviewing a legal document where all changes are related to written copy, the most efficient way to highlight and provide comments is by using theText Select tool. This tool allows the user to select specific text in the document and attach comments directly related to the text, making it easier for others to understand the context of the feedback.

TheText Select toolis specifically designed for making text-based comments, which is ideal for written copy changes.

Options A (Freehand tool) and B (Box tool) are better suited for graphical annotations or drawing attention to areas of images, not text-specific feedback.

For more details, refer toWorkfront Proofing documentationon proofing tools and their use cases.